Re: [389-devel] (3rd revision) Please Review {516089} add option to ldlct for deref esearch "-e deref=deref:attr"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/10/2009 09:22 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
On 11/10/2009 09:13 AM, yi zhang wrote:
On 11/10/2009 07:53 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
yi zhang wrote:
patched code running through valgrind is below:
ok - looks good
Thanks for check it for me :)
Pushed to master.

Counting objects: 21, done.
Delta compression using 2 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (11/11), done.
Writing objects: 100% (11/11), 2.66 KiB, done.
Total 11 (delta 9), reused 0 (delta 0)
To ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/389/ds.git
   45507e8..b403fae  master -> master
Thanks!

Yi

Yi
============================================================
[yi@f11-32x bin]$ valgrind --num-callers=32 --tool=memcheck --leak-check=full --leak-resolution=high ./ldclt-bin -h mv64a-vm.idm.lab.bos.redhat.com -p 10368 -D "cn=directory manager" -w Secret123 -E 1000 -e esearch -e deref=secretary:uid -e random -b ou=people,dc=example,dc=com -f uid=ref.XXX -r 1 -R 999 -n 10 -N 100 -T 1000 -W 1
==32029== Memcheck, a memory error detector.
==32029== Copyright (C) 2002-2008, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==32029== Using LibVEX rev 1884, a library for dynamic binary translation.
==32029== Copyright (C) 2004-2008, and GNU GPL'd, by OpenWorks LLP.
==32029== Using valgrind-3.4.1, a dynamic binary instrumentation framework. ==32029== Copyright (C) 2000-2008, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==32029== For more details, rerun with: -v
==32029==
ldclt version 4.23
ldclt[32029]: Starting at Mon Nov  9 16:00:21 2009

ldclt[32029]: Average rate:    8.00/thr  (   8.00/sec), total:     80
ldclt[32029]: Average rate:    9.00/thr  (   9.00/sec), total:     90
ldclt[32029]: Average rate:    9.00/thr  (   9.00/sec), total:     90
ldclt[32029]: Average rate:    9.00/thr  (   9.00/sec), total:     90
ldclt[32029]: Average rate:   10.00/thr  (  10.00/sec), total:    100
ldclt[32029]: Average rate:    8.90/thr  (   8.90/sec), total:     89
ldclt[32029]: Average rate:    9.10/thr  (   9.10/sec), total:     91
ldclt[32029]: Average rate:    9.00/thr  (   9.00/sec), total:     90
...
... (similar to above lines)
...
ldclt[32029]: Average rate:    8.90/thr  (   8.90/sec), total:     89
ldclt[32029]: Average rate:    9.00/thr  (   9.00/sec), total:     90
ldclt[32029]: Average rate:    9.10/thr  (   9.10/sec), total:     91
ldclt[32029]: Global average rate: 817.90/thr ( 9.09/sec), total: 8179
ldclt[32029]: Global number times "no activity" reports: never
ldclt[32029]: Global no error occurs during this session.
ldclt[32029]: Average rate:    9.60/thr  (   9.60/sec), total:     96
ldclt[32029]: Average rate:    9.00/thr  (   9.00/sec), total:     90
ldclt[32029]: Average rate:    9.00/thr  (   9.00/sec), total:     90
ldclt[32029]: Number of samples achieved. Bye-bye...
ldclt[32029]: All threads are dead - exit.
ldclt[32029]: Global average rate: 909.80/thr ( 9.10/sec), total: 9098
ldclt[32029]: Global number times "no activity" reports: never
ldclt[32029]: Global no error occurs during this session.
ldclt[32029]: Ending at Mon Nov  9 16:17:01 2009
ldclt[32029]: Exit status 0 - No problem during execution.
==32029==
==32029== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 77 from 1)
==32029== malloc/free: in use at exit: 112,634 bytes in 433 blocks.
==32029== malloc/free: 155,332 allocs, 154,899 frees, 50,418,474 bytes allocated.
==32029== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v
==32029== searching for pointers to 433 not-freed blocks.
==32029== checked 106,181,236 bytes.
==32029==
==32029== 1,360 bytes in 10 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 48 of 55
==32029==    at 0x4004E5C: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:397)
==32029==    by 0x156D2B: _dl_allocate_tls (in /lib/ld-2.10.1.so)
==32029== by 0x3122C3: pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.1 (in /lib/libpthread-2.10.1.so)
==32029==    by 0x805858E: ldclt_thread_create (port.c:319)
==32029==    by 0x8051C97: runThem (ldclt.c:651)
==32029==    by 0x8057137: main (ldclt.c:3260)
==32029==
==32029== LEAK SUMMARY:
==32029==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==32029==      possibly lost: 1,360 bytes in 10 blocks.
==32029==    still reachable: 111,274 bytes in 423 blocks.
==32029==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==32029== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown. ==32029== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes
========================================================

On 11/09/2009 03:45 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
yi zhang wrote:


ack

I would encourage you to run this through valgrind to make sure you catch any memory errors.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel


--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel

--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel


--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel

--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel

--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel

--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [CentOS]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux