Does it mean that when "nsslapd-require-secure-binds" is "on" then even the anonymous binds should be made by SSL? Maybe there is some sense in leaving a possibility to have anonymous binds non-SSL and frocing non-anonymous ones to be secure?
2009/5/15 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Nathan Kinder wrote:
Looks good.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
Fedora-directory-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
--
Fedora-directory-devel mailing list
Fedora-directory-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
-- Fedora-directory-devel mailing list Fedora-directory-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
