On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 16:02 -0600, Richard Megginson wrote: > Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 17:24 +0200, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > >> I've been playing with Fedora DS replication and Samba, and have been > >> making good progress. > >> > >> See http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/LDAP_Backend/Fedora_DS for > >> the evolving set of instructions (should get better over the next week). > >> > >> I need this patch applied (and possibly the bitwise patch too) to get > >> the replication working. > >> > >> I also had to hack up mmr.pl to take a port, and not assume 389 > >> > > > > I've updated the wiki, and I would like some feedback. I've not yet > > retested the procedure here, but I wondered if (at a glance) this could > > be made simpler? Is there anything I can cut out? > > > The list of packages on FC7 - you also need svrcore-devel, > mozldap-devel, and posssibly perl-Mozilla-LDAP and mozldap-tools Thanks, I'll update the list. > For the bitwise patch - is there a bug for this already? Maybe we > should just commit the bitwise plugin to fedora ds. I've just filed a bug for you, #239764. > For the schema - you could just remove all unnecessary schema files from > $prefix/etc/fedora-ds/schema. ds_newinst.pl copies all of those files > to the new instance directory, so if you don't want them, you could just > remove them from there. I would rather not do that. > > Can parts of the Fedora DS configuration itself be replicated across the > > replication protocol, > No. Only schema added over LDAP. > > or at least can I use the initial_ldif to set > > things up? > I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean fds-extra.ldif? > > It didn't seem to apply to dse.ldif. > > > I'm not sure what you mean. I re-read the docs, and the InstallLdif command only applies to the data partition, not any configuration. > > Should we have a way to specify to ds_newinst.pl that only the very base > > schema is to be loaded? Then I think I could add the Samba schema > > directly with LDAP, and avoid having to copy that too. > > > Sure. It would probably be a nice option to have. Filed as #239765 Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-directory-devel mailing list Fedora-directory-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
