On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 15:16 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On a Linux system, would it be possible to build Fedora DS without
> setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
As a followup, it seems to me that we don't need it (I was about to
start patching makefiles):
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb7fc7000)
libslapd.so.0
=> /scratch/fedora-ds/prefix/lib/fedora-ds/libslapd.so.0 (0xb7f14000)
libssldap60.so => /usr/lib/libssldap60.so (0xb7ef3000)
libprldap60.so => /usr/lib/libprldap60.so (0xb7eed000)
And my ns-slapd binary starts perfectly well without any LD_LIBRARY_PATH
foo.
> I thought I saw this being discussed at some point, and I wondered if I
> could suggest it again. It could remove some of the shell-script
> wrapper stuff, which kind of looks funny...
>
> BTW, how is this packaged? I think the '-bin' versions of the commands
> should be in libexec, if they are not to be directly executed...
Unless I'm missing something drastic, we shouldn't need these scripts at
all. None of the binaries I had showed any undefined libraries...
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-directory-devel mailing list Fedora-directory-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
