Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Your if vendor code would be zero. Presumably Samba would be enabled with access in line with its operational requirements. Bearing in mind that Samba runs as root, it is likely to find that any machine it is installed on has anonymous access for root, just like it is allowed to actually run as root.And where OpenLDAP has done something first, or it's way of doing things is more sane, I ask that Fedora DS follow that lead. I need less, not more 'if <vendor>' code...
I believe we have already discussed this and that I have already agreed that we would look at it.(In this vane, I so wish nsUniqueID was in standard GUID format, rather than %08x-%08x-%08x-%08x...)
-- Pete
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Fedora-directory-devel mailing list Fedora-directory-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
