On Friday 16 February 2007 04:12:16 pm Richard Megginson wrote: > As we found out the hard way, the new Fedora Extras fedora-ds package > conflicts with existing fedora-ds 1.0.x installations. I've tried > Conflicts: fedora-ds < 1.1 > and > Conflicts: fedora-ds <= 1.0.4 > neither one prevents you from installing fedora-ds 1.1 on top of your > fedora-ds 1.0.4 installation and removing the admin server and console. > > I propose that we change the package naming to reflect the actual > contents. So, the current fedora-ds 1.1 would be called fedora-ds-core, > which is really what it is - the core LDAP server and command line tools > - the core functionality. > > Subsequent packages would follow this convention: fedora-ds-admin, > fedora-ds-console, etc. We could then have a fedora-ds "meta package" > which had nothing in it but dependencies on fedora-ds-core, > fedora-ds-admin, etc. and perhaps a few scripts, so that you could 'yum > install fedora-ds' and it would install the same functionality as the > fedora-ds 1.0.4 package. This gets a +1 from me -- Dennis Gilmore, RHCE -- Fedora-directory-devel mailing list Fedora-directory-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
