On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 20:23 -0800, Pete Rowley wrote: > ok > > Richard Megginson wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227771 > > Resolves: bug 227771 > > Bug Description: FHS: use sysconfdir (/etc) as config file location > > Reviewed by: ??? > > Files: see diff > > Branch: HEAD > > Fix Description: After much deliberation, we have decided that it is > > ok that our dynamic config files are under /etc/fedora-ds/slapd-instance. > > So the config_dir will be /etc/fedora-ds/slapd-instance and the > > security and schema files will go there as well. Since the FHS is > > ambiguous about this issue, and it will be very confusing if the > > configuration files are not under /etc, and there are some agents > > (webmin, cfengine) that do "dynamically" modify config files under > > /etc, this outweighs any considerations about having the server using > > it's config file like an "ascii database". The debian folks (who take FHS seriously) won't buy that. The real test is the ability to have a read only /etc. This sounds like a /var/lib thing. Before you get into pain over this, I suggest finding a FHS expert. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-directory-devel mailing list Fedora-directory-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel
