Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 15:35 -0700, Pete Rowley wrote:
The problem is the list of broken things is open ended. Perhaps we should drill down on a specific example (like the "person" objectclass and associated attributes) and look at what is different. At least that will make sure we are all talking about the same thing and the folks on the list might have more targetted suggestions.Why not deal with the specific problems that arise when /adding/ the ADschema? I'm guessing that would be a shorter list?Because the AD schema is a whole schema, not just some extra attributes/objectClasses, I need to be able to replace 'person', andmany other classes that Microsoft has modified.Once I start replacing classes, I need to know the list of 'if I replace this, bad things happen'.
Though, I thought the plan was to make the DS look like AD through Sambas lens? Are we just talking about an interim development situation until you add the "lens"? If so, I say break what you like. Otherwise I would have big concerns about integration with existing DS deployments.
-- Pete
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
