Re: [Fedora-directory-devel] Announcing Fedora DS - dsbuild with debug support

[Rob Crittenden <rcritten@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Richard Megginson wrote:
> Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 17:40 -0700, Richard Megginson wrote:
> >  
> >
> > > Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 17:16 -0700, Richard Megginson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >     
> > > >
> > > > > Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >  
> > > > >       
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 15:56 -0700, Richard Megginson wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    
> > > > > >         
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now you can use the one step build method - 
> > > > > > > http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Building#One-Step_Build - 
> > > > > > > to build a debug version of the server, suitable for gdb and the 
> > > > > > > like.  Please try it out and let us know how it works.
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >      
> > > > > > >           
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm trying this on FC5test1 to see if I can build FDS against gcj.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    
> > > > > >         
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmm - if you just want to check our java code, you might want to 
> > > > > just build the Java based components with gcj - 
> > > > > http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/BuildingConsole and the 
> > > > > like.  But I suppose you will want to test the console against the 
> > > > > server once it is compiled.
> > > > >  
> > > > >       
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, I'd like to compile the whole thing, if possible.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >     
> > > >
> > > > > > One
> > > > > > nit is the instructions:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > % cd to dsbuild/meta/ds
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > should read:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > % cd dsbuild/meta/ds
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    
> > > > > >         
> > > > >
> > > > > Done.
> > > > >
> > > > >  
> > > > >       
> > > > >
> > > > > > The next problem is that I can't find apr-config for FC5.  All I 
> > > > > > have is
> > > > > > apr-1-config.  When I modify ds/mod_nss/Makefile's CONFIGURE_ARGS to
> > > > > > change --with-apr-config to 
> > > > > > --with-apr-config=/usr/bin/apr-1-config the
> > > > > > build fails like this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    
> > > > > >         
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmm - what version of Apache does FC5 use?  Try
> > > > > apr-1-config --version
> > > > >  
> > > > >       
> > > >
> > > > $ apr-1-config --version
> > > > 1.2.2
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >     
> > > >
> > > > > and
> > > > > /usr/sbin/httpd.worker -v
> > > > >  
> > > > >       
> > > >
> > > > $ /usr/sbin/httpd.worker -v
> > > > Server version: Apache/2.2.0
> > > > Server built:   Jan  5 2006 06:53:51
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >     
> > >
> > > Ah.  It looks as though there will be some porting work - darn - why 
> > > the heck did they have to change the include files used for modules 
> > > from Apache 2.0 to Apache 2.2 :-(
> > >   
> >
> >
> > Joe Orton (CCed) may know; Joe is there some compatibility package I can
> > install to work around 2.0 -> 2.2 header differences?
> >  
> Or better yet - is there a way we can change our module code so that it 
> compiles with Apache 2.0 and 2.2?

The mod_nss tip does compile against either version. It hasn't been 
heavily tested against 2.2 but I had no problems in my limited testing.

rob

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature