We don't have any published performance numbers or benchmarks. We're working on putting something together. But in the meantime, I will say that 1) FDS performs good enough for any application where read/search performance is more critical than write performance (otherwise, use an RDBMS) 2) FDS is faster, scales better, and is more reliable than most LDAP servers 3) No LDAP server performs significantly better than FDS - in certain cases under certain conditions, some LDAP servers perform very slightly better, and that usually requires a lot of careful config file tuning William.Zhang wrote: > thanks in advance. >?????????????????????????????????????痂b?j(?????????????????????????????????????m???r?)?扫hｗ(??? > >-- >Fedora-directory-devel mailing list >Fedora-directory-devel@xxxxxxxxxx >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-devel > >
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
