https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152319 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #6) > You are right that the patch is wrong. The only slnames that need a > correction are the LGPL's. I think more appropriate place for a dependency > on Software::License is Module::Build rather then Module::Starter. That's what I thought too but it might introduce bootstrapping issues, with the bootstrap Module::Build not having the dependency and the dual-lived one subsequently introducing it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a7DCQsvhov&a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
