https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152319 --- Comment #5 from Richard Poole <rp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- The patch you've applied fixes the case where Software::License is not installed at the expense of breaking the case where Software::License *is* installed - it changes the values of the field called "slname", which is used in Module::Build, later in the build process, as the name of the license as Software::License thinks of it. (This is why the field is called "slname".) The patched version works for the artistic license version 2 but breaks several other licenses, including the Perl license and the GPL. As most module authors will have Software::License installed and the most commonly used license is the Perl license, this will in practice break the majority of installations. I think the best fix of all would be for Module::Starter to require Software::License and use it for its license-related logic; Software::License is capable of checking strings for compliance with CPAN::Meta , among other things. But that involves rather more work. I stand by my original suggestion, that Module::Starter should be distributed in Fedora without this patch but with a dependency on Software::License. That won't break anything that currently works and will make a significant class of confusing errors impossible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AGc08khuLB&a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
