https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062757 --- Comment #6 from František Dvořák <valtri@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Matěj Cepl from comment #5) > (In reply to František Dvořák from comment #4) > > There were a recommendation to not using absolute paths when invoking perl > > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892597#c3): > > ./configure is not absolute path, and IMHO /usr/bin/perl INSIDE Of the > script doesn’t count as it is the standard location of perl. If we ever > change that, we will have a way more problems than grepping all SPEC files > to change the location. > I see. In the initial version of the glite-lb-types were explicitly used '/usr/bin/perl' in spec, so the recommendation were to replace it by 'perl'. And using only './configure' will be even better. > Anyway, APPROVED! Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=93WP2QS4yH&a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
