https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131073 --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Moo-1.006000 breaks perl-MooX-Types-MooseLike tests. The stack trace changed since Moo-1.00500, whose output is parsed by the test: # Failed test 'The error looks like a useful stacktrace' # at t/basic.t line 322. # 'isa check for "an_undef" failed: is not undef! at (eval 24) line 452. # eval {...} called at (eval 24) line 450 # MooX::Types::MooseLike::Test::new("MooX::Types::MooseLike::Test", "an_undef", "") called at t/basic.t line 321 # main::__ANON__() called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Test/Fatal.pm line 45 # Test::Fatal::try {...} () called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Try/Tiny.pm line 76 # eval {...} called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Try/Tiny.pm line 72 # Try::Tiny::try(CODE(0x262b5e0), Try::Tiny::Catch=REF(0x262b2b0)) called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Test/Fatal.pm line 52 # Test::Fatal::exception(CODE(0x247d838)) called at t/basic.t line 322 # ' # doesn't match '(?^:is not undef.*\n.*MooX::Types::MooseLike::Test::new.*basic\.t)' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 74. t/basic.t ........................ Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/74 subtests That's one of the reasons I do not rebase largely changed packages in older Fedoras. You can break code which worked before. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3qcURA8CKu&a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
