On 03/07/2014 03:03 PM, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
commit 6154c8d5bf3654510f44dce7f86edc87113acab5
Author: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>
Date: Fri Mar 7 15:02:58 2014 +0100
Do not BR packages that are not present in el7
perl-Email-Abstract.spec | 10 ++++++++--
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Email-Abstract.spec b/perl-Email-Abstract.spec
index ee6f5cd..ad6336d 100644
--- a/perl-Email-Abstract.spec
+++ b/perl-Email-Abstract.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Email-Abstract
Version: 3.007
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 1%{?dist}.1
Summary: Unified interface to mail representations
Group: Development/Libraries
License: GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -17,8 +17,11 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) >= 0.96
BuildRequires: perl(lib)
BuildRequires: perl(strict)
BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
-BuildRequires: perl(Mail::Message), perl(Scalar::Util)
+BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util)
+%if 0%{?rhel} == 0
+BuildRequires: perl(Mail::Message)
BuildRequires: perl(Email::MIME)
+%endif
Are you sure this step is helpful?
These requirements also are run-time requirements, which means all you
are doing is to remove BR: which expose runtime-requirements,
but actually are shipping a crippled package.
IMO, the correct fix would be to add the missing perl-modules to rhel
and not to remove these BRs.
Ralf
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
