https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056804 Bug ID: 1056804 Summary: (possibly) branch for EPEL 7 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-HTML-Element-Extended Assignee: psabata@xxxxxxxxxx Reporter: notting@xxxxxxxxxx QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, psabata@xxxxxxxxxx Description of problem: I need to build perl-HTML-TableExtract for EPEL 7. It has a buildrequirement on perl-HTML-Element-Extended. (added as part of a perl-sig update) However, it doesn't have a runtime requirement on it, looking at current builds. It also seems to build the same package when perl-HTML-Element-Extended isn't installed. So, we could just branch perl-HTML-Element-Extended for EPEL 7, so I can build my package. But I'm curious whether it's really needed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Looking at F20/devel packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7gpvpYpU6n&a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
