[Bug 552105] cpanspec treats recommended dependencies to required

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105

CJ Kucera <pez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #6 from CJ Kucera <pez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Yeah, this would be nice to patch in.  Perhaps it makes sense to have an extra
argument for handling these?  So the user could choose how to deal with
'recommend'ed packages?  Not that hand-editing the .spec file is difficult
after-the-fact, of course.

(I came across this by stumbling across a fun loop where HTTP::Tiny recommends
HTTP::CookieJar, which recommends Mozilla::PublicSuffix, which then *requires*
HTTP::Tiny.  Had been wondering how in the world that came to be until I
noticed the recommend statements.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BQoiRt5BMk&a=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux