https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984185 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I was speaking to the Security team, because I was interested in their point of view. The common practice until now was "add the full relro to long time running apps, especially daemons". In opinion of Security team, languages don't need full relro if they don't write into pointers like this example: http://cs.potsdam.edu/cgi-bin/man/man2html?Glib::Object+3 Glib::Object->new_from_pointer Therefore Perl is a good candidate for full relro. I would like to see analysis of slowdown of Perl examples and also all major components before we start changing partial relro into full relro. I'd rather see same approach for whole distribution than accidentally changing some apps. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bViOO4fGet&a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
