Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894195 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #2) > Well, perl requires perl-libs, so the directory would not be unowned in any > case ? Are you sure this is correct? I am not. Actually I think it's a case where dual ownership is correct. > ( and sorry to have waited to enter this bug, as you have already pushed a > update for another issue ) Well, technically there is nothing wrong with the directory being owned by both packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CGNlWUFWak&a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
