https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836835 --- Comment #3 from pcpa <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > I found some bug reports after some googling about issues with pari-2.5, > > and, when attempting to convert Pari.xs to pari-2.5 api it got too much > > confusing due to internal api changes. > > > > Since perl-Math-Pari should be the only showstopper of pari-2.5 update, I > > believe it should be ok to build perl's Pari.so with an internal pari > > implementation without depending on system pari. > > > > I agree this is somewhat hackish, but I believe better than creating a > > pari23 package. > > On the other hand, that would require a library bundling exemption from > FESCO, which might not be granted. The libpari23 package I have ready would > not require that, you could review it and once it's in place we could then > update pari to 2.5.1 without breaking anything. > > If I submit the libpari23 package for review, will you review it? Yes, I will review it! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
