Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810223 --- Comment #12 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-16 09:44:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I removed the build-dependency only in perl-HTML-Parser-3.69-5.fc18. Thanks. > Please make sure none of the two packages will be needed for building other > packages (even transitively) during the bootstrap. Because now you can build > both of them, but you cannot use any of them (the run-time dependencies will be > unsatisfied). Why do you say that? Once they are both built, they are both installable, are they not? perl-HTML-Parser is very low down in the build dependency hierarchy, and if it was uninstallable then it would impact the build of 772 other packages, which either build-require it or some other package that build-requires/requires it. The build order as I see it at the moment is available here: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/perl-boot/buildorder perl-HTML-Parser can be built in the 2nd pass and perl-HTTP-Message can be built in the 3rd pass, so they should both be usable for builds from the 4th pass onwards (where packages in pass N have at least one build dependency [or runtime dependency of one] built in the previous pass and all packages in a given pass can be built in parallel as they have no dependencies on each other). I described the boot process as I understand it in an email to the perl-devel list last week: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/perl-devel/2012-April/050071.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
