Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741777 Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iarnell@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-12 13:01:54 EDT --- Only a half-hearted objection - I don't care too much about perl-Tk. But Tk::MMutil is nothing more than a Tk-specific EU::MM extension. Nothing explicitly requires or buildrequires it. Only a couple of perl-Tk packages (perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac and perl-Tk-TableMatrix) expect it to be there at build time due to BR perl(Tk) - and however you resolve this, both would need to be updated as a result (unless you do nothing, of course). I think it would be slightly more obvious for builds to fail because EU::MM is missing rather than Tk::MMutil is missing. Pretty much everyone knows what to do if EU::MM is missing at build time (just BR EU::MM). Missing Tk::MMutil could easily lead to "WTF is Tk::MMutil?" <check on CPAN> "WTF? It's part of Tk, and perl-Tk is installed, but Tk::MMutil is missing!!". Bottom line, yes, perl-Tk should strictly require EU::MM. But for ~99.9% of users, it doesn't actually need to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
