On 09/23/2011 01:16 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:18:13PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: >> On 09/23/2011 12:06 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:23:30AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: >>>> On 09/23/2011 12:19 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >>>>> The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: >>>>> >>>>> ====================================================================== >>>>> The results in this summary consider Test Updates! >>>>> ====================================================================== >>>>> >>>>> package: perl-BerkeleyDB-0.48-2.fc16.i686 from fedora-16-development-i386 >>>>> unresolved deps: >>>>> libdb = 0:5.2.28 >>>>> >>>>> package: perl-BerkeleyDB-0.48-2.fc16.x86_64 from fedora-16-development-x86_64 >>>>> unresolved deps: >>>>> libdb = 0:5.2.28 >>>> >>>> I built an update for this and was working with jnovy on getting it >>>> added to the libdb update to ensure that they'd get pushed to stable >>>> at the same time but ppisar has created a separate update in bodhi >>>> for perl-BerkeleyDB so we'll need to coordinate pushing these at the >>>> same time. >>>> >>> I thought you forgot to push the build into updates, so I did that. I've just >>> deleted the update. Take perl-BerkeleyDB-0.49-2.fc16 to your common update >>> set. >> >> Thanks; unfortunately that can't happen until jnovy gets commit >> access to perl-BerkeleyDB or provenpackager status (which he's >> currently applying for (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/672). >> Hopefully one or both of those will happen soon. >> > I recreated the update with both packages as I'm proven packager. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libdb-5.2.36-1.fc16,perl-BerkeleyDB-0.49-2.fc16 Great stuff; thanks. Paul. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
