On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:46:47AM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: >> I suppose we can leave it as it is, but we should remove sub-packages >> from perl if they are dual lifed. This would fix problem with debuginfo. >> Perl package has only one debuginfo package for everything and dual life >> debuginfo packages conflict with files from perl-debuginfo. >> > Exactly. Before RPM/gdb maintainers implement per-subpackage debuginfos (if > at all), moving dule-lived packages back from core to vendor directory will > solve debuginfo files conflicts. Indeed. I'd forgotten that we're installing some of the dual-lifed modules to archlib. Installing perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 debuginfo is okay (it's installed to vendorarch), but perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib debuginfo conflicts with perl. I agree that we should stick to using separate vendorarch for modules from the CPAN. -- Iain. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
