On 06/03/2011 10:29 PM, Iain Arnell wrote: > 2011/6/1 Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> On 06/01/2011 03:28 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: >>> >>> Now that Fedora 15 is out, I was hoping we would work perl 5.14 in >>> rawhide quickly enough as to be able to fix all the resulting bugs in >>> time for Fedora 16 release. >>> >>> Is anything planned? >>> >>> Emmanuel >> >> On perl porters were reported serious bugs with 5.14.0, so we are >> waiting for 5.14.1 anyway. >> >> At the moment I and Petr are working on new filters, better generating >> of provides and requires and automatic script for rebuild of related >> packages. We'd like to push all changes in test build target in koji. >> Hopefully, this time it will be easier than rebuild for perl5.12. > > For kicks, I rebuilt all perl-* packages in mock recently against > 5.14. After getting all the arch-specific packages rebuilt in the > correct order (actually, just repeatedly rebuild all failing > arch-dependent packages until no more builds succeed), everything else > pretty much just works. Most failures are fixed simply by updating to > latest upstream version or applying a patch from rt - and I pushed a > bunch of these into rawhide a few weeks ago. I never got around to > finalising the rest, but ended up with around 35 failures, many of > which have an upstream update available or a patch in rt. From the > list I have here at the minute (which may be incomplete), these > packages had non-trivial problems: > > perl-Class-DBI-AsForm > perl-DBM-Deep > perl-Mail-MboxParser > perl-mogilefs-server > perl-Net-FTPServer > perl-Net-SSH-Perl > perl-OpenFrame > perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule That didn't work with 5.12. > perl-rpm-build-perl I guess problem with new rpm. > perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker > > I've got limited time for the next week or so, but will try to get a > proper list of failures, reasons, and (potential) fixes shortly after > that. > > Bottom line, though, I'd rather see 5.14.0 in rawhide soon so that we > can iron out the difficulties together. A later update to 5.14.1 > /should/ be trivial with no need for an additional mass rebuild. > > Of course, the newly dual-lifed packages that were added to core in > 5.14 need to be sub-packaged in perl.spec too as we have all of them > as separate packages already. I have a patch, but can't get my hands > on it until June 13th. > I built 5.14.0 in dist-f16-perl. We'd like to start rebuilt in this branch tomorrow after we polish our script. Warning will be sent to fedora-devel. -- Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà BaseOS team Brno -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
