Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689709 --- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-23 08:52:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I am insisting on bcond_without, because > > our interest is Fedora, a distro which is incrementally built and want to test > our packages "to the max" as part of our regular works whenever we build our > packages. > > i.e. people who are trying to bootstrap from scratch for whatever reasons, are > not of any importance and need to be taught that Fedora is incrementally built. > Apart of perl, they will be facing similar issue all over the place, e.g. when > building gcc/glibc/kernel (also an incrementally built system). I agree entirely with the argument. Rebuilders who need this should be forced to add --with bootstrap. But the bcond magic to do that is bcond_with, not bcond_without: # Handle conditional builds. %bcond_with is for case when feature is # default off and needs to be activated with --with ... command line # switch. %bcond_without is for the dual case. # # %bcond_with foo defines symbol with_foo if --with foo was specified on # command line. # %bcond_without foo defines symbol with_foo if --without foo was *not* # specified on command line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
