Re: perl @INC (paths) again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/31/2011 04:21 PM, Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà wrote:
> Hello,
> because some questions and blocked reviews [1]. I feel that we really
> need discuss our @INC paths once again. I wrote proposal, which is
> almost the same as was the one sent to the list few months ago [2].
> 
> This is only proposal and there are also other possibilities, how to
> create specific directory for installation of users rpms. I'd like to
> change this proposal to FPC guidelines maybe for next Fedora, therefore
> I really like to know your opinions.
> 
> Best regards,
> Marcela
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672629
> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/Draft:INC_directories

Hello again,
I think about my previous proposal and fixed typos. I still believe it
will be useful, so I created ticket for Fedora Packaging Guidelines.
They can decide whether it's all right.

Thank you everyone for their input.

https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/73

-- 
Marcela MaÅlÃÅovÃ
BaseOS team Brno
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux