Re: perl @INC (paths) again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Iain Arnell [03/02/2011 09:31] :
>
> I agree. Marcela's proposal is fine in principle, but unlikely to
> achieve much in practice.

I have to admit this is my conclusion as well.

> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > So overall I'm in favour of using the F-15 set of paths (assuming the
> > typos are fixed) but sticking with the vendor directories for everything
> > apart from the perl core.
> 
> +1 to that.

Add my +1 to the list.

Emmanuel

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux