On 01/31/2011 04:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 01/31/2011 04:21 PM, Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà wrote: >> Hello, >> because some questions and blocked reviews [1]. I feel that we really >> need discuss our @INC paths once again. > > Thanks for trying to launch such a discussion. > > I am blocking these reviews, because I feel redhat.cz has drawn > uncommunicated, arguable and questionable decisions, which are at risk > of to run down Fedora's perl. > >> This is only proposal and there are also other possibilities, how to >> create specific directory for installation of users rpms. I'd like to >> change this proposal to FPC guidelines maybe for next Fedora, therefore >> I really like to know your opinions. > > I promise to read it in depth and to think about it, but I won't have > much time this week. Marcela, what are we supposed to think of the fact you are continuing to accept packages which do not install into vendor_dir? I interpret these actions of yours, as you not being interested in settling the issues, but you wanting to implement facts by brute-force. This is not helpful. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
