On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > because of bug in paths (vendorarch), there will be needed > rebuild of some packages (~1300). I choose only those > which weren't rebuild with vendorarch in Perl. [1] > > I've asked for testing dist tag, so nothing will be > broken [2]. Rebuild will start next week. Is there something in place to avoid the problems we had last time with "older" packages from the rebuild tag overriding "newer" packages in dist-f15 itself? And is a separate tag really necessary for this? Perl is already looking in both core and vendor directories, so there should be no breakage due to modules installed in the "wrong" place. And I'm still not sure what the intended result is meant to be. Are you planning to update all the specs to use privlib/archlib so that everything ends up in the core directories? Or keeping vendorlib/vendorarch and merely rebuilding to move the modules out of the core directories again? -- Iain. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
