[Bug 630714] perl-Module-Signature-0.66 is available

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630714

Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
        Last Closed|2010-09-06 17:29:51         |2010-09-07 15:31:28

--- Comment #5 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> 2010-09-07 15:31:28 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> F14 isn't a problem at the moment, but would have been if upgraded to 0.65;
> version 0.64 in F14 at present isn't affected by this issue.

Yep, found that out as well.  I'll leave F14 at 0.64 for now.

Just out of interest, I wonder if there's a reason for _public_maniskip() and
the version number check in your patch, why not just do something like this
instead?

my $_maniskip = ExtUtils::Manifest->can("maniskip") ?
    &ExtUtils::Manifest::maniskip : &ExtUtils::Manifest::_maniskip;

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux