Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #17 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-07-22 05:37:24 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: mojomojo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fulltext -> full text, full-text, Fullerton => ignorable binary RPM: mojomojo.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fulltext -> full text, full-text, Fullerton => ignorable mojomojo.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/mojomojo/uploads 0750L mojomojo.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mojomojo.conf 0640L mojomojo.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/mojomojo/index 0750L mojomojo.noarch: E: non-readable /var/lib/mojomojo/mojomojo.db 0640L => intended, security reasons mojomojo-selinux.noarch: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/share/selinux/strict/mojomojo.pp /usr/share/selinux/targeted/mojomojo.pp => ignorable, chances for /targeted and strict to reside on different devices are close to nil. Not to mention that the content of this package should be transferred to selinux-policy. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of source file: eab857f0e22824dfbc16afba63dc70ec3612c87a MojoMojo-1.01.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [!] Final provides and requires are sane. I guess a bit of filtering is needed here, as we have, under requires: perl(Catalyst) perl(Catalyst) >= 5.8000 perl(Data::Page) perl(Data::Page) >= 2.00 perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime) >= 0.28 perl(File::MMagic) perl(File::MMagic) >= 1.27 perl(HTML::Entities) perl(HTML::Entities) >= 3.60 perl(HTML::Strip) perl(HTML::Strip) >= 1.04 perl(MRO::Compat) perl(MRO::Compat) >= 0.10 perl(Text::Context) perl(Text::Context) >= 3.5 perl >= 0:5.008004 /usr/bin/perl === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel, noarch [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: devel, noarch [?] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] %check is present and the test passes. === OPTIONAL ITEMS === [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). === Issues === See above (comment 16 and the "Requires" section) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
