On 07/03/2010 10:16 AM, Iain Arnell wrote: > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Remi Collet<Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Le 03/07/2010 10:02, Iain Arnell a écrit : >> >>>> How this should be handled nicely ? >>> >>> Exactly as it is at the minute - continue allow perl modules to share >>> directory ownership. >>> >>> I think the "Multiple packages own files in a common directory but >>> none of them needs to require the others."[1] rule would cover it. In >>> general, module A::B::C doesn't necessarily require A::B (or even A). >> >> Of course, I was asking in the case A::B::C requires A::B >> >> In the case of the package I'm working on the review: >> perl-Test-Script-Run requires perl-Test-Exception >> which own /usr/share/perl5/Test dir. > > Well the perl rpm itself owns /usr/share/perl5/Test, so then no > perl-Test-* module should own it. Even in this case, all perl-modules installing something below */Test should own */Test, because "Test" modules (even those now in perl) may move between modules in future. Ralf -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
