Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592672 --- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan <shakthimaan@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-15 11:30:26 EDT --- Upstream was forked into couple of new designs, and hasn't made much progress. But, this release of the package has over 800 downloads, and is a very useful tool. So, have chosen this release, and as of now we are upstream. <quote> The big clean-up with %{__rm} -rf `find . -name 'config*' is dangerous. (Imagine a file name contained a white space). Use "find -name 'config*' -depth -exec rm -rf -- '{}' \+" or something like that. </quote> Sorry, I didn't understand the difference. In both cases, we still use 'config*' within quotes. Should I change each removal to use "find -name 'config*' -exec rm -rf -- '{}' \+" ? <quote> * Why the hct.pl has '.pl' extension? Is it necessary? Original build system delivers "hct" wrapper (if it worked). What about just "hct" name or symlink to hct.pl? </quote> The original wrapper has hard-coded the path as #!/bin/sh /Users/smaurer/Downloads/0.7.60/hct.pl $@ Since, we are packaging, we only need the hct.pl file. Since, it is a Perl script, it has the .pl extension, and I thought it was ok to have it, and thus haven't changed it. Do you want me to rename the file to simply hct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
