On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: >> Author: pghmcfc >> >> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6 >> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6 >> >> Modified Files: >> perl-Date-Simple.spec >> Log Message: >> Minor clean-ups >> >> >> Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6/perl-Date-Simple.spec,v >> retrieving revision 1.13 >> retrieving revision 1.14 >> diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14 >> --- perl-Date-Simple.spec 26 Jul 2009 05:33:20 -0000 1.13 >> +++ perl-Date-Simple.spec 11 May 2010 14:21:45 -0000 1.14 > >> -* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering<rel-eng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 3.03-2 >> +* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering<rel-eng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 3.03-2 >> - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild > > What are you trying to achieve? Just making the changelog format consistent within the spec file. > I am not aware of any rule mandating "<email> version". > Conversely, Fedora has been using<email> - "version" for ages. > cf. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines I know; the "-" is optional. > That said, IMO, all your changes do is rendering diffs between different > distros less readable. True, at the expense of a slight readability improvement (IMHO) in the current spec. Shouldn't be a problem going forward though, and if I push an update for an older release, that'll get the same changes too, which will help with the diffs. Paul. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
