Re: Why perl-*.i686.rpm on x86_64?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/05/2010 04:33 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
>    
>> We certainly did ship earlier perl for both arches; check the F7-F12
>> releases. (Have't checked earlier, but it's been there forever.)
>>
>>      
>>>> I file a ticket for rel-eng: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3695
>>>>          
>>> OK, I realize this ticked was closed immediately.
>>>        
>> It stems from the attached. It may not make sense now that libperl is
>> separate; at the time, it wasn't.
>>      
> I've taken the whitelist out in upstream mash; that being said, it's
> unlikely that will make F-13 release. (It's not like it causes issues,
> afaik.)
>    
OK with me.

Ralf

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux