----- "Chris Weyl" <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > One thing we didn't talk about here -- given that the independent > subpackages are replacing dual-lifed core modules, should we be using > %perl_archlib/_privlib rather than %perl_vendorarch/_vendorlib? I > realise this is mainly nomenclature here, as we currently have one > set > to the other, but it would seem to make sense (especially if we go > back to having distinct vendor directories). > > I have a preference to using the core macros vs vendor macros, but am > ok with it either way as long as we realize that we're making a > choice > here. > > -Chris > -- > Chris Weyl > Ex astris, scientia > -- > Fedora Extras Perl SIG > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl > perl-devel mailing list > perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel I agree with core macros. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
