----- "Marcela Maslanova" <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ----- "Iain Arnell" <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:33:31 +0100 > > > Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Marcela Maslanova > > >> <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > This should test whether yum can handle lower version in main > and > > >> > higher in separated package (Module::Build). The update of > > packages > > >> > went fine if 'Obsoletes' is used in new package [2]. > > >> > > >> Aha. Of course - 'Obsoletes' is necessary, but not why you think. > > The > > >> problem here is that we may be moving from arch-dependent > packages > > >> (i.e. 1:perl-Module-Build-0.3500-110.fc13.x86_64) to noarch > > packages > > >> (i.e. 1:perl-Module-Build-0.3603-1.perltestrepo.noarch). Even > > though > > >> ENVR is higher in the noarch package, yum wont automatically > update > > >> from arch-dependant to noarch. > > > > > > That shouldn't be the case any more: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502401 > > > (fixed in F-11, at least it's supposed to be) > > > > Hmmn. Confirmed - I have no problem with yum updating from current > > 1:perl-Pod-Simple-3.07-87.fc12.x86_64 in F12 to locally built > > 1:perl-Pod-Simple-3.13-1.fc12.noarch. Are you running some old > version > > of yum Marcela? > > > On F-13? No, I have yum-3.2.26-4.fc13.noarch. Maybe that's some side > effect > of my previous experiments. I'll try package more modules and check it > on clean install. Pod::Simple passed even without 'Obsoletes' so > that's probably > not needed at all. Not sure what was wrong with yum. Now are these updates working. > > Also I'll try to fix 'noarch' in perl.spec. Fixed. So, if anyone is willing to start with reviews of sub-packages... I've added into Draft that I should be co-maintainer, therefore feel free to take any sub-package you want :) I suppose we should be careful and don't update in all releases all modules because of ugly build issues like #564836 and #555420. I suppose this happened because of changes in Module::Build, but I could be wrong. Hopefully at least these two will be fixed by update to the latest release. > > Also ;-) If anyone want add/fix something on Drafts below, please do > so. > > > > -- > > Iain. > > -- > > Fedora Extras Perl SIG > > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl > > perl-devel mailing list > > perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel > -- > Fedora Extras Perl SIG > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl > perl-devel mailing list > perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
