Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567633 Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |opensource@xxxxxxxxx Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #6 from Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-02-24 13:08:39 EST --- The dependencies are not really duplicated, because they differ in undisplayed ways, e.g. /sbin/new-kernel-pkg is required in post and preun: $ depnames-files.py kernel-2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12.x86_64.rpm| sort | uniq -c 1 interp R /bin/sh 1 post R /bin/sh 1 post R /sbin/new-kernel-pkg 1 pre R dracut >= 001-7 1 pre R fileutils 1 pre R grubby >= 7.0.4-1 1 pre R initscripts >= 8.11.1-1 1 pre R kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12 1 pre R module-init-tools 1 preun R /bin/sh 1 preun R /sbin/new-kernel-pkg 1 rpmlib R rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib R rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib R rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib R rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 1 rpmlib R rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 The script used to show this is based on this one: http://laiskiainen.org/rpm/scripts/depnames.py There is some explanation about the script here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-December/msg02021.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel