Re: Fwd: rpms/perl/devel perl.spec,1.246,1.247

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/18/2009 10:29 PM, Chris Weyl wrote:
> I could go either way on this; but I think we should pick an approach
> and stick with it, unless there's compelling reasons otherwise...  And
> the current approach seems to be working well.
> 
> Also...  Even if we exclude these modules w/o providing them as
> sub-packages, we ought to ensure that they're still pulled in by
> perl-core (and perl itself, when we make the
> perl-core/perl/perl-minimal switch).

Agreed on both points.

~spot

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux