https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230255 Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emmanuel@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #9 from Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #8) > > Why would a package showing docs need a HTTP client? It is possible (and documented) to run "perldoc URL". See https://metacpan.org/dist/Pod-Perldoc/source/lib/Pod/Perldoc.pm#L271 > Is the HTTP client really needed or it could be made optional? I do not see Pod::Perldoc handling gracefully the fact that HTTP::Tiny is not installed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230255 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202230255%23c9 -- _______________________________________________ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
