https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700 "FeRD" (Frank Dana) <ferdnyc@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ferdnyc@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #13 from "FeRD" (Frank Dana) <ferdnyc@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #12) > > However, while having zero knowledge about the package, I wonder if symlinks > are the right solution. It seems to me that in this case the fonts can be > considered web assets and should follow the appropriate guideline [1]. That > means these should be served from the proper place and just the common > virtual font requires should be used instead. > > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Web_Assets#Fonts I've submitted https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rt/pull-request/2 which makes changes along the lines of what Vit outlined here. It sets the internal fontpath of the package to /usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/ instead of using the symlinked indirection via /usr/share/rt/fonts/, and depends on font(droidsans) and font(droidsansfallback) instead of using filesystem paths. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731700 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201731700%23c13 -- _______________________________________________ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
