[Bug 2043170] New: Please branch and build perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy for EPEL9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043170

            Bug ID: 2043170
           Summary: Please branch and build
                    perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy for EPEL9
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
            Status: NEW
         Component: perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy
          Assignee: emmanuel@xxxxxxxxx
          Reporter: michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                CC: emmanuel@xxxxxxxxx, extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
                    iarnell@xxxxxxxxx, perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Depends On: 2031812, 2038283
            Blocks: 2038285
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Fedora



+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2038283 +++

This is a dependency for public-inbox, that I'm trying to package for EPEL8 and
9.

I'm happy to comaintain (FAS: salimma) and be set to be the POC for EPEL bugs.
You can also add the epel-packagers-sig group as collaborator on epel*
branches.

Thanks!

--- Additional comment from Michel Alexandre Salim on 2022-01-15 15:56:35 PST
---

Will you be able to branch and build perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy in
epel8 and epel9?
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish
to build it on epel9 (FAS salimma).

--- Additional comment from Emmanuel Seyman on 2022-01-16 01:01:13 PST ---

I've requested an epel8 branch:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41013

For EPEL9, we still need perl-Plack

--- Additional comment from Michel Alexandre Salim on 2022-01-19 21:59:56 PST
---

(In reply to Emmanuel Seyman from comment #2)
> I've requested an epel8 branch:
> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41013
> 
> For EPEL9, we still need perl-Plack

thanks, looks like the branch is processed. Can we just build this for EPEL 8
first? EPEL 9 is less urgent, for my package there are other missing
dependencies and those requesting EPEL are still mostly on 8 for the next few
months.



Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031812
[Bug 2031812] perl-Plack for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038283
[Bug 2038283] Please branch and build perl-Plack-Middleware-ReverseProxy for
EPEL8 and EPEL9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038285
[Bug 2038285] Branch and build public-inbox for EPEL8 and EPEL9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043170
_______________________________________________
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]

  Powered by Linux