On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 22:22:40 +0100 Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, folks. > > A while back, a few of us went through a mad rush to get our packages > in EPEL. This lead to a number of situations where the main > maintainer of a package didn't want to maintain the EPEL8 version of > his package and we had to wait for a proven-packager to push to the > branch. > > I'ld like to propose we create a perl-packagers-sig group so that we > can have non-proven packagers being able to git push. > > Thoughts? Opinions? Rotten tomatoes? This is fine by me but would mainly need buy-in from the packagers that don't want to support EPEL as they'd have to have perl-packagers-sig group added to their packages and they might have concerns about other people committing updates in the Fedora branches. Paul. _______________________________________________ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
