https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762445 Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |dmach@xxxxxxxxxx, | |jmracek@xxxxxxxxxx, | |jrohel@xxxxxxxxxx, | |mblaha@xxxxxxxxxx, | |mhatina@xxxxxxxxxx, | |packaging-team-maint@redhat | |.com, pkratoch@xxxxxxxxxx, | |rpm-software-management@lis | |ts.fedoraproject.org, | |vmukhame@xxxxxxxxxx Component|perl-HTTP-Tiny |dnf Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Assignee|ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx |rpm-software-management@lis | |ts.fedoraproject.org Last Closed| |2019-11-04 09:05:06 --- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Your "dnf info" showed only an already installed package (Repository: @System). The "From repo: local-fedora" is a value remembered when installing the package. It does not have to reflect current location of the package in repositories. It's better to use "dnf --disablerepo=... --enablerepo=... repoquery PACKAGE" to verify where the package is now. But because the modular package was not located with "dnf info", while "dnf upgrade" saw it, I conclude it is some bug in DNF that manifests with some state of the repositories. I will reassign this bug to DNF (it's not specific to perl-HTTP_Tiny package) and close it because it cannot be reproduced. If the problem emerges again, please reopen this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
