https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609221 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG |--- Keywords| |Reopened --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Okay, that is a different situation. Copyright has not been abandoned (or expired) on this work, the author has merely granted a sort of meta-license which permits for any OSI approved license to be applied. Technically, "Public Domain" is not an OSI approved license, so it is not a valid choice (though, I suspect it was the maintainer's attempt to quantify that weird meta-license). The easy fix is to change the License field to be something permissive and OSI approved. I would suggest changing the spec to: # Technically, the license allows us to choose any OSI approved license, so we # choose MIT for maximal compatibility. License: MIT -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/EAWH5BKKYNWTE2TA3MYXD32VFC6TK54K/