https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1542666 --- Comment #6 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- It's the correct issue. It talks about this very same problem. It's not important whether the disputed item is an icon in Gnome or a Perl module in @INC. It also discusses the (un)helpfulnes of weak dependencies. The line for me is that a module load failure is handled by the code. In this case the error message does not looks so, but there is a special handling in the code instead of a plain "require Foo;" or so. Also the documentations clearly states it's an optional feature. In an ideal world this package would declare a "password authentication" as an optional feature and connect it to the dependency on IO::Pty. And your package would require the "password authentication" feature. The reality is that RPM does not support it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
