https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481324 --- Comment #13 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Tomasz Kłoczko from comment #9) > > (2) I don't buy the argument with less and more frequent libraries. That was exactly the subject of bug #905482. The consistency. > > Just unpacked one more time perl-XML-LibXSLT and done experiment: > > [tkloczko@domek XML-LibXSLT-1.95]$ grep -r gdbm * > [tkloczko@domek XML-LibXSLT-1.95]$ > > If none of the files in this module has anything about gdbm it must be > logical conclusion that this library in the past was offered by perl-devel. > there is only few packages in whole distribution which requires and uses > gdbm-devel and of these packages is perl -> in the past perl-devel > incorrectly have been offering this library. > > Do you see any other explanation why in the past -lgdbm was used during > linking DSO of perl-XML-LibXSLT? > The explanation is I patched perl-XML-LibXSLT's Makefile.PL to use $Config{perllibs} instead of $Config{libs}. The original upstream code is still affected. You can see <http://grep.cpan.me/?q=%5C%24Config%5C%7Blibs%5C%7D> for all CPAN distributions that uses the $Config{libs} value. Maybe they are wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
