https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481324 Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpazdziora@xxxxxxxxxx Version|27 |rawhide Assignee|jplesnik@xxxxxxxxxx |ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx Flags| |needinfo?(jpazdziora@redhat | |.com) --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Your suggestions contradicts with bug #905482. I won't add or remove the dependencies in each release to please the contemporary more loudly camp of proponents or opponents of requiring libraries listed in the Perl's configuration. Please find consensus first. In my opinion, the dependencies should not be there because %Config contains data about how the perl was configured and built. Many of them have only an informational purpose and are not intended to be thrown to compiler or linker. E.g. $Config{locincpth} lists /opt/GNU/include directory. Should perl-devel package depend on the (nonexitent!) directory? I guess everybody agrees it shouldn't. E.g. $Config{libs} lists -lgdbm library. Should perl-devel package depend on gdbm-devel? Some people think it should. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
