Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537138 --- Comment #9 from Alex Lancaster <alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-12 16:49:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Alot of packages are not, i spent half the day methodically rebuilding a bunch > of packages that were missing or needed newer versions. I haven't figured out > if all of them are epel, though i think some of them, including libxml2 are > core packages and it might not be possible to update them without difficulty. Does libxml2 need to be updated for running bioperl? Is it that old? > At $dayjob we've decided to stop using cpan to install modules and to focus our > efforts on building RPMs where possible. As long as i can do it within the > infrastructure of Fedora/EPEL, this will be ok, and i am more than willing to > take up any branches that we need to support EPEL so long i'm working at this > job. Presumably if i leave, this duty will be picked up by my successor. Great! > Comaintanership is always welcome. Right, and actually I request that I be added as a co-maintainer of any EPEL branches of packages I own in Fedora proper, see (FAS username "alexlan"): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusNo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
